Comment Submitted by Paul Page, Charleston Housing Authority

Document ID: HUD-2008-0087-0005
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Department Of Housing And Urban Development
Received Date: September 30 2008, at 02:49 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: October 3 2008, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: August 21 2008, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: October 20 2008, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 8072f1b1
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

I disagree with the Proposed PHAS rule concerning the Physical Inspection section that states that If the tenant has changed locks, the entire unit or entire project receives a failing score. This is not fair and should be removed from the proposed rule.

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 129
Comment Submitted by Tamara Widmann
Public Submission    Posted: 08/24/2008     ID: HUD-2008-0087-0002

Oct 20,2008 11:59 PM ET
Comment Submitted by John Roberto
Public Submission    Posted: 09/24/2008     ID: HUD-2008-0087-0003

Oct 20,2008 11:59 PM ET
Comment Submitted by Carol Biersach, Slinger Housing Authority
Public Submission    Posted: 10/03/2008     ID: HUD-2008-0087-0004

Oct 20,2008 11:59 PM ET
Comment Submitted by Paul Page, Charleston Housing Authority
Public Submission    Posted: 10/03/2008     ID: HUD-2008-0087-0005

Oct 20,2008 11:59 PM ET
Comment Submitted by Robert Pearson, Housing Authority of the City of Santa Barbara
Public Submission    Posted: 10/10/2008     ID: HUD-2008-0087-0008

Oct 20,2008 11:59 PM ET