The current and proposed program income requirements are very burdensome and
create inefficiencies for states. Tracking program income for the life of the
program income is not an efficient or effective way for states to spend their already
limited administrative and financial resources nor is it the best way for HUD to
track funds and the accomplishments of CDBG funding. States could spend
months and years trying to capture information from grantees that no longer have
grants with the state, yet they have program income at a level that narrowly
exceeds the threshold. Reporting on program income for an unspecified period of
time is a waste of resources. Additionally, a conditional closeout process would
prevent states from formally closing out a grant year with HUD. This would be
another administrative nightmare for the states as well as HUD.
Allowing states the authority to capture all program income or a portion thereof for
reallocation to eligible CDBG projects is a more efficient way to track funds and
their accomplishments. Program income should be re-granted as a new grant to
new or existing grantees. States should have the authority to develop new and
innovative programs that best meet the needs of the State and units of local
governments. These grants would be tracked and reported in the same manner
as any CDBG project. These program income requirements do not support our
County’s efforts to conserve and the Federal governments Paperwork Reduction
Act.
To reiterate, our recommendation is for the states to determine the best way to
track and report program income, which may be to recapture all or a portion of
program income for reallocation to new projects and or grantees. States should
be provided the flexibility to determine the best method to address program
income, which could be one of the following:
1. Request all program income be returned to the state, which would be
those funds that have exceeded the threshold.
2. Request all income generated from grants returned to the state (funds
less than $50,000).
3. Request income generated that exceeds a certain amount (defined by
the state) returned to the state.
Comment Submitted by Gail Hammond, NYS Housing Trust Fund Corporation - Office of Community Renewal
This is comment on Proposed Rule
FR–5181–P–01 State Community Development Block Grant Program: Administrative Rule Changes
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 12/04/2008 ID: HUD-2008-0126-0002
Dec 16,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 12/19/2008 ID: HUD-2008-0126-0003
Dec 16,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 12/19/2008 ID: HUD-2008-0126-0006
Dec 16,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 12/19/2008 ID: HUD-2008-0126-0007
Dec 16,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 12/19/2008 ID: HUD-2008-0126-0004
Dec 16,2008 11:59 PM ET