Unless there is an explicit statutory mandate to do so, there should be no preferences given on the basis of "Indian" (racial) as opposed to "tribal" (political) status. See Morton v. Mancari. The former is a racial classification and, therefore, triggers strict scrutiny and is presumptively unconstitutional. See Adarand Constuctors, Inc. v. Pena and Personnel Administrator v. Feeney. (The three decisions cited are all from the U.S. Supreme Court.)
Comment Submitted by Roger Clegg, Center for Equal Opportunity
This is comment on Proposed Rule
FR-5275-P-11 Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Reauthorization Act of 2008: Amendments to Program Regulations
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 11/28/2011 ID: HUD-2009-0007-0095
Jan 17,2012 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 01/13/2012 ID: HUD-2009-0007-0096
Jan 17,2012 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 01/13/2012 ID: HUD-2009-0007-0097
Jan 17,2012 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 01/13/2012 ID: HUD-2009-0007-0098
Jan 17,2012 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 01/17/2012 ID: HUD-2009-0007-0099
Jan 17,2012 11:59 PM ET