Comment Submitted by Roger Clegg, Center for Equal Opportunity

Document ID: HUD-2009-0007-0095
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Department Of Housing And Urban Development
Received Date: November 28 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Date Posted: November 28 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: November 18 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: January 17 2012, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80f74a0a
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

Unless there is an explicit statutory mandate to do so, there should be no preferences given on the basis of "Indian" (racial) as opposed to "tribal" (political) status. See Morton v. Mancari. The former is a racial classification and, therefore, triggers strict scrutiny and is presumptively unconstitutional. See Adarand Constuctors, Inc. v. Pena and Personnel Administrator v. Feeney. (The three decisions cited are all from the U.S. Supreme Court.)

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 20
Comment Submitted by Roger Clegg, Center for Equal Opportunity
Public Submission    Posted: 11/28/2011     ID: HUD-2009-0007-0095

Jan 17,2012 11:59 PM ET
Comment Submitted by Chris Placentia, Port Gamble S'Klallam Housing Authority
Public Submission    Posted: 01/13/2012     ID: HUD-2009-0007-0096

Jan 17,2012 11:59 PM ET
Comment Submitted by Sami Jo Difuntorum, Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians
Public Submission    Posted: 01/13/2012     ID: HUD-2009-0007-0097

Jan 17,2012 11:59 PM ET
Comment Submitted by Blake Kazama, Tlingit- Haida Regional Housing Authority
Public Submission    Posted: 01/13/2012     ID: HUD-2009-0007-0098

Jan 17,2012 11:59 PM ET
Comment Submitted by Timothy J. Humphrey Sr., Stetson Law Offices
Public Submission    Posted: 01/17/2012     ID: HUD-2009-0007-0099

Jan 17,2012 11:59 PM ET