Comment Submitted by Andrew Gallasher, West Virginia Housing Institute Inc.

Document ID: HUD-2009-0155-0009
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Department Of Housing And Urban Development
Received Date: January 14 2010, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Date Posted: January 15 2010, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: December 15 2009, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: February 16 2010, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80a7d8e3
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

I am writing on behalf of the manufactured housing industry in West Virginia to comment on HUD proposals to the SAFE Act, 24 CFR 30 and 3400. West Virginia’s SAFE Act, passed last year, provides that the definition for a mortgage loan originator does not include a manufactured or modular home retailer employee who performs purely administrative or clerical tasks and who receives only the customary salary or commission from the employer in connection with the sales transaction. The industry in West Virginia asks that you clarify in your rule that the same exemption applies under this rule for employees in the manufactured and modular industry who engaging in what is purely an administrative task of accepting a loan application. We believe this dovetails nicely with your proposed definition under 3400.103 (66557) of the Federal Register vol. 74, No. 239, proposed Dec. 15, 2009. Under this section (2) you say, “An individual does not engage in the business of a loan originator merely by performing administrative or clerical tasks.” Section (C) (1) says the person takes an application “if the individual receives a residential mortgage loan application for the purpose or deciding (or influencing or soliciting the decision of another) … “ The West Virginia Office of Banking and the state Bankers Association provided the language used in our exemption. Neither wanted members of our industry to be in a position of being legally licensed to take loan applications. We believe this restriction is sensible. We do not want to be licensed as mortgage bankers, either. We encourage you to ensure such an exemption is included in the federal act when an employee is engaged in merely an administrative function. Thank you. Sincerely, Andrew V. Gallagher Executive director, West Virginia Housing Institute, Inc. Andy_wvhi@verizon.net

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 4,905
Comment Submitted by Melissa Shjegstad
Public Submission    Posted: 12/16/2009     ID: HUD-2009-0155-0002

Feb 16,2010 11:59 PM ET
Comment Submitted by Michael Bradley, PMHA
Public Submission    Posted: 12/21/2009     ID: HUD-2009-0155-0003

Feb 16,2010 11:59 PM ET
Comment Submitted by David Hyde
Public Submission    Posted: 12/24/2009     ID: HUD-2009-0155-0004

Feb 16,2010 11:59 PM ET
Comment Submitted by Katherine Matties
Public Submission    Posted: 12/30/2009     ID: HUD-2009-0155-0005

Feb 16,2010 11:59 PM ET
Comment Submitted by Joseph Waltuch, Commissioner, State of Nevada, Division of Mortgage Lending
Public Submission    Posted: 01/05/2010     ID: HUD-2009-0155-0006

Feb 16,2010 11:59 PM ET