Comment Submitted by Jericho Shackelford

This comment is directed to the ambiguity found under section "Findings and Certifications: The Regulatory Flexibility Act" The proposed rule sites findings concluding that the number of number of small entity section eight owners is insufficient to qualify as substantial. What then qualifies a number as being substantial? Each number that is deemed insufficient would be an owner entity, or family that is adversely affected by this legislation. If there is a paragraph drafted to solicit help on the situation why are there no numbers offered with which an entity may work? In order for this proposed rule to be properly seen by the public the numbers of said public that will be affected by a negative externality of the proposed rule must be shown. Also this number must be shown against that number which would be positively affected.