RE: economic reasons and economic hardships. Economic hardships are a subset of economic reasons. A change in employment is an economic reason to move. Losing a job is an economic hardship whereas changing from one job to another would only be an economic reason. Changing to a lower paying job could very well be an economic hardship. This means that there is a higher standard for whether living in the house of another qualifies you as at-risk of homelessness than frequent moves. That seems counter-intuitive and contrary to the spirit of the law, but since the distinction is statutory, I'm not sure how one would resolve this. Is there anything in the legislative history to suggest exactly what kind of distinction Congress wanted to make? My advice would be to treat the two terms as synonyms.
Comment Submitted by Richard Dodson, Austin Travis County Integral Care- HMIS (3rd Comment)
This is comment on Rule
FR–5474–I–01 Homeless Emergency Assistance and Rapid Transition to Housing: Emergency Solutions Grants Program and Consolidated Plan Conforming Amendments
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 12/09/2011 ID: HUD-2011-0153-0005
Feb 03,2012 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 12/19/2011 ID: HUD-2011-0153-0006
Feb 03,2012 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 12/22/2011 ID: HUD-2011-0153-0007
Feb 03,2012 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 12/22/2011 ID: HUD-2011-0153-0009
Feb 03,2012 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 12/29/2011 ID: HUD-2011-0153-0010
Feb 03,2012 11:59 PM ET