Comment Submitted by Bonnie Brampton

I disagree with your preposed limit for the maximum possible period for which a unit can be under a project-based voucher contract to 30 years. All stakeholders agree that this is contrary to the statute, which permits a potentially unlimited number of 15-year contract extensions. These extensions need to continue. · The preamble to the proposed rule states the intent to provide tenants with a reliable long-term lease unless an owner has a “good cause” to terminate or not renew a lease. However, one paragraph of the proposed regulatory text continues to allow an owner to terminate a lease without good cause.I strongly disagree with this preposed added text,persons on Housing Voucher Section 8 have enough issues with Bias, and targeted as undesiarable tennents by Landloards. This addidtion to allow Terination with out good cause opens a pandoras box for discrimination, homlessness. Persons such as myself NEED PROTECTION UNDER THE LAW NOT LESS. PLEASE DO NOT ADD THIS PARAGRAPH ! · I Advocate to endorse a provision which would require owners to provide tenants with a one-year notice of intent to not renew a project-based voucher contract.