Comment Submitted by Karen Sroka, Atlas Realty Management Company, Inc.

Document ID: HUD-2013-0047-0002
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Department Of Housing And Urban Development
Received Date: June 24 2013, at 12:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: June 24 2013, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: May 24 2013, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: July 23 2013, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 1jx-8633-iiav
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

Allowing tenants to make $50 payments on a pet deposit does not serve the community's needs. 1. It is an administrative burden to track the payments 2. More importantly, a pet can do substantial damage before the full amount of deposit is collected. A dog that has not been walked frequently enough by an elderly (perhaps physically impaired) person can destroy the carpet by soiling it. This also becomes a health hazard for other residents and staff.

Related Comments

   
Total: 1
Comment Submitted by Karen Sroka, Atlas Realty Management Company, Inc.
Public Submission    Posted: 06/24/2013     ID: HUD-2013-0047-0002

Jul 23,2013 11:59 PM ET