Comment on FR Doc # E8-14901

Document ID: IRS-2008-0072-0010
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Internal Revenue Service
Received Date: July 10 2008, at 09:30 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: July 11 2008, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: July 1 2008, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: September 29 2008, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80664624
View Document:  View as format xml

This is comment on Proposed Rule

Extension of Time for Filing Returns

View Comment

I understand the theory behind the shorter pass-thru entity extension period. However, if your theory holds water for 1041 and 1065 returns, why do you not include the other pass-thru entity of the 1120S? This is completely inconsistent, in my opinion!

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 76
Comment on FR Doc # E8-14901
Public Submission    Posted: 07/11/2008     ID: IRS-2008-0072-0004

Sep 29,2008 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # E8-14901
Public Submission    Posted: 07/11/2008     ID: IRS-2008-0072-0005

Sep 29,2008 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # E8-14901
Public Submission    Posted: 07/11/2008     ID: IRS-2008-0072-0006

Sep 29,2008 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # E8-14901
Public Submission    Posted: 07/11/2008     ID: IRS-2008-0072-0009

Sep 29,2008 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # E8-14901
Public Submission    Posted: 07/11/2008     ID: IRS-2008-0072-0010

Sep 29,2008 11:59 PM ET