Section 511 imposes a massive unfunded mandate and will cause significant
administrative and other financial burdens, including the cost of revising our
accounts payable system to implement the new law. We are a small city with a
very small accounting staff, and tax reduction initiatives (popular in Washington
State) inhibit our ability to keep up with our already growing workload as we do not
have the financial capacity to add staff. Additional cost will also be borne by the
city of Everett due to the fact that the costs for doing business with us will
increase, and private sector companies are sure to pass those costs along.
State and local governments are already required to assist the IRS in its collection
duties by reporting payments to corporations and individuals. It is our
understanding that there is no evidence that this reporting is insufficient to identify
noncompliance by state and local contractors. This new withholding provision is
merely a new mechanism for facilitating tax deposits, which shifts the burden of
collection from the federal government to state and local governments at a
significant cost. We respectfully request that you reverse this decision.
Comment on FR Doc # E8-28789
This is comment on Proposed Rule
Withholding Under Internal Revenue Code Section 3402(t)
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 12/12/2008 ID: IRS-2008-0104-0003
Mar 05,2009 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 01/14/2009 ID: IRS-2008-0104-0007
Mar 05,2009 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 01/14/2009 ID: IRS-2008-0104-0008
Mar 05,2009 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 01/22/2009 ID: IRS-2008-0104-0010
Mar 05,2009 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 01/27/2009 ID: IRS-2008-0104-0011
Mar 05,2009 11:59 PM ET