Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14396

Document ID: IRS-2010-0013-0007
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Internal Revenue Service
Received Date: June 15 2010, at 12:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: June 22 2010, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: June 15 2010, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: September 13 2010, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80b02875
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

I understand this is a rule-making process whereby the IRS implements the will of Congress, but it's still absurd. The tax on tanning services is a bad idea on several levels. Most importantly, a tax indicates government arrogance in directing our lives. I don't use a tanning salon because I think they are unhealthy, but that should be my choice to make without the bullying arm of government pushing me one way or the other. Also, like the cigarette tax, the tax on tanning services creates a declining revenue source. As the tax incentivizes fewer people to use tanning services, the revenue from the tax will drop off, and whatever government program depends on that funding will require funding from another source. Inevitably, taxes will be raised, either on the tanning services or in some other area, to compensate for the decline in revenue.

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 99
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14396
Public Submission    Posted: 06/21/2010     ID: IRS-2010-0013-0003

Sep 13,2010 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14396
Public Submission    Posted: 06/22/2010     ID: IRS-2010-0013-0004

Sep 13,2010 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14396
Public Submission    Posted: 06/22/2010     ID: IRS-2010-0013-0006

Sep 13,2010 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14396
Public Submission    Posted: 06/22/2010     ID: IRS-2010-0013-0007

Sep 13,2010 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14396
Public Submission    Posted: 06/22/2010     ID: IRS-2010-0013-0008

Sep 13,2010 11:59 PM ET