Comment on FR Doc # 2011-10758

Document ID: IRS-2011-0009-0006
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Internal Revenue Service
Received Date: June 27 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: June 28 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: May 9 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: August 8 2011, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80eb441c
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

As District's continue to see huge decreases in funds available for school districts, this seems like a huge unfunded mandate for local schools. I also see no reason why utilities should be included in the calculation to determine if a District meets the 100 million dollar limit. Those entities are already regulated by the State and federal government. How are District's supposed to pay for this increased administrative function? Our budgets continue to decrease from the state, federal government and local taxpayers. Our District has no funds to implement an accounts payable withholding function. At this point we do not meet the standard, however we will when we go to the voters for capital construction dollars. So this could put a huge bearing on costs associated with managing those dollars for a two to three year period.

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 37
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-10758
Public Submission    Posted: 05/10/2011     ID: IRS-2011-0009-0002

Aug 08,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-10758
Public Submission    Posted: 06/28/2011     ID: IRS-2011-0009-0006

Aug 08,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-10758
Public Submission    Posted: 07/12/2011     ID: IRS-2011-0009-0007

Aug 08,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-10758
Public Submission    Posted: 07/12/2011     ID: IRS-2011-0009-0008

Aug 08,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-10758
Public Submission    Posted: 07/22/2011     ID: IRS-2011-0009-0009

Aug 08,2011 11:59 PM ET