Ryan J. James - Comment

I propose, along with other citizens and groups who have shared their views thus far, that the issue at hand is not whether the methodologies for limiting GHG emissions by Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles is effective, but instead if it is the government’s role, specifically the EPA’s, to administer a limitation on vehicle manufacturers based on the science of global climate change. In other words, the question at hand should be, “Does the government have the right to regulate the automotive industry (or any industry) based off of the still-controversial scientific findings of global climate change/warming?” In short, no. Here’s why: If the government were to establish this rule in a different context, and for different reasons such as the livelihood of communities or the conservation of natural resources, then maybe it might be viewed differently by many who oppose it. But instead, this rule is yet another oppressive requirement on American auto industries and based on scientific claims that many scientists disagree with. Automobile manufacturing organizations are already struggling, and do not need more government oversight and regulation, but instead business strategies that are attentive ears to the input and needs of consumers. Let the people put limitations on the automobile industry, but please not the government! A capitalist economy is what has made America a technologically-advanced, world superpower; Americans have been able to respond in a free market capitalist setting to the wants and needs of their communities without government coercion or manipulation. Rules such as this regulation on Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles are inherently un-American, because they undermine the capitalist economic system which was established upon America’s inception. I humbly ask that this rule be done away with and that the EPA’s role with regard to global climate change be re-evaluated. Sincerely, Ryan James