Jeffrey M. Bridges - Comment

Document ID: NHTSA-2010-0087-0026
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Received Date: October 27 2010, at 12:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: November 1 2010, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: September 23 2010, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: November 22 2010, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80b790ae
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

EPA rules regarding fuel mileage "grades" are not warranted. In fact they would only serve to represent another otherwise useless bit of information. To date, I have not personally found that any of the existing mileage estimates on new cars are accurate. In fact, I find them to be an insult to the taxpayer. The agency should serve the public. Not itself. And by making yet another grading system would serve only to increase the size the agency and not serve the public or taxpayer with any useful information. I am not in favor of any expansion of any government agency accept the armed forces. And i also beleive that the EPA and NHTSA have both become political arms to be used to further an agenda. I would like to see the agency reduced to advisory counsel only.

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 19
Richard Loveday - Comment
Public Submission    Posted: 09/28/2010     ID: NHTSA-2010-0087-0012

Nov 22,2010 11:59 PM ET
Jeffrey M. Bridges - Comment
Public Submission    Posted: 11/01/2010     ID: NHTSA-2010-0087-0026

Nov 22,2010 11:59 PM ET
Attached (2)
Public Submission    Posted: 12/07/2010     ID: NHTSA-2010-0087-0039

Nov 22,2010 11:59 PM ET
Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America - Comment
Public Submission    Posted: 12/07/2010     ID: NHTSA-2010-0087-0040

Nov 22,2010 11:59 PM ET
Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America - Comment
Public Submission    Posted: 12/07/2010     ID: NHTSA-2010-0087-0041

Nov 22,2010 11:59 PM ET