Anonymous - Comment

On the surface this seems like important research, however because of the huge number of variables (even with all the attempts to match subjects) the results will be difficult to interpret. We certainly know that rider training teaches/improves physical skills. Does rider training have an impact on risk reduction choice making? The answer to this likely depends on the type/kind, method of basic training, and who (what individual) actually conducts the training. I see nothing in the proposal that identifies how variables in the actual training will be accounted for. How will this be done? Will this be done? Failure to take differences in training into account will invalidate the findings. For example, MSF BRC training conducted at one site, might be significantly different from MSF BRC training conducted at another - one rushes riders through with an emphasis on skill accusation while another delivers significant "safety messages." These differences need to be addressed.