This comment is to register my opposition to the NHTSA proposal for direct final rulemaking (DFR). Particularly, I am concerned by the provision for "minor substantive rules or changes to existing rules on which the agency does not expect adverse comment.". The agency's judgement on what rules will expect adverse comment should not replace the standard comment process, particularly in the case, as one of the most important purposes of these comments are to notify the NHTSA that rules have adverse consenquences which the agency did not expect.
Sam Creasey
This is comment on Proposed Rule
Direct Final Rulemaking Procedures
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 04/04/2013 ID: NHTSA-2013-0042-0003
May 28,2013 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 04/04/2013 ID: NHTSA-2013-0042-0002
May 28,2013 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 04/04/2013 ID: NHTSA-2013-0042-0005
May 28,2013 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 04/11/2013 ID: NHTSA-2013-0042-0011
May 28,2013 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 04/04/2013 ID: NHTSA-2013-0042-0004
May 28,2013 11:59 PM ET