I am always concerned when the federal government decides that an act that has
been around for 20 years and has been used successfully to lessen the impact
humans have on the environment is no longer viable in its current form. In
particular, with last minute changes prior to a new administration. With that in
mind, I am opposed to any changes to the ESA. Anything that is done at this
stage of the game is more than likely politically motivated and based on lobbyists
for whomever has been most impacted by this act.
At this point in time, a new administration should be the one to affect change in
the ESA not the one leaving. The public has spoken as to the past style of
operation, in the dead of night and the cloak of silence. Leave the ESA alone.
Comment from KAREN ASH, NA
This is comment on Proposed Rule
Endangered and Threatened Species; Critical Habitat for the Endangered Distinct Population Segment of Smalltooth Sawfish
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 03/06/2009 ID: NOAA-NMFS-2008-0004-0005
Jan 20,2009 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 03/06/2009 ID: NOAA-NMFS-2008-0004-0006
Jan 20,2009 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 03/06/2009 ID: NOAA-NMFS-2008-0004-0007
Jan 20,2009 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 03/06/2009 ID: NOAA-NMFS-2008-0004-0009
Jan 20,2009 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 03/06/2009 ID: NOAA-NMFS-2008-0004-0010
Jan 20,2009 11:59 PM ET