RIN 0648?AW32
Comment Regarding the Proposed Endangered Status for Black Abalone
While it is clear that the population of the black abalone is declining at an
alarming rate, it seems that protection as an endangered species can provide
little protection from the forces causing this decline. No doubt, the current
population of the species could be much higher had commercial fishing been
curbed at an earlier time,but one would think that the cessation of such
harvesting in California as early as 1993 would yield greater numbers than are
observed today. Despite the California coastline comprising such a large
portion of the abalone's habitat, the numbers have not grown since the close of
black abalone fishing.
The abalone's decline since this time has been largely, and correctly,
attributed to the abalone withering disease. It has been noted that beyond the
listing of the abalone as an endangered species, procedures to create a
protected habitat have begun. However, given that the species current decline
can be attributed to the disease, I fail to see how habitat protection or
protection from harvesting could provide benefit to the black abalone. Rather
than focusing on hollow promises of protection and redundant restrictions,
should there not be a more rigorous investigation into possible ways to mitigate
the harms of the wasting disease?
Studies suggest that rising water temperatures or any number of other
factors
may contribute to the spread of the disease. Accepting these studies as true, I
feel that the so called protection being afforded the species could not possibly
yield any real world results in terms of conservation without some form of
parallel program seeking a solution to the spread of the withering disease.
Otherwise, what protection is being provided beyond a convenient habitat in
which the species may become extinct?
While protection as an endangered species is no doubt warranted in this
case,
and while the future establishment of a protected habitat for the black abalone
is an important step toward ensuring the survival of the species, these steps
alone will not meet the goals for which they are created. It is imperative that
this is but the beginning of a multi-step process in reviving the black abalone
population, and not constitute the culmination of efforts to protect the
species. Otherwise, the current proposed rule sits as little more than a
band-aid on an ever growing problem.
Comment by J. Harvey on 0648-AW32
This is comment on Proposed Rule
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Proposed Endangered Status for Black Abalone
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 04/14/2008 ID: NOAA-NMFS-2008-0032-0005
Apr 10,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 04/14/2008 ID: NOAA-NMFS-2008-0032-0006
Apr 10,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 04/14/2008 ID: NOAA-NMFS-2008-0032-0008
Apr 10,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 07/02/2008 ID: NOAA-NMFS-2008-0032-0009
Apr 10,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 07/02/2008 ID: NOAA-NMFS-2008-0032-0010
Apr 10,2008 11:59 PM ET