Comment from Dan MacMahon

Document ID: NOAA-NMFS-2008-0310-0017
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: National Oceanic And Atmospheric Administration
Received Date: January 12 2010, at 09:02 AM Eastern Standard Time
Date Posted: March 4 2010, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: December 31 2009, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: March 1 2010, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80a7bab9
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

After studying the new 35F bottom longlining boundry lines, it appears that under the current boundry lines, longlining will be allowed on the middle and the lower part of the area called the "Elbow". This area is a ridge of high structure, made up of limestone rock with some peaks rising 30 feet or more. This area is also much shallower than the required minimum of 210 feet for longlining. Depths in this area range from roughly 160 to 190 feet of water. This area needs protection from this destructive gear. Bottom longlining has no place in a high relief area such as this. The boundry lines need to be adjusted to stay outside this area. This would simply require that the 35f minimum depth lines be adhered to, which would curve around this shallower area. Simply running a straight line between two points is what is causing this problem and it needs to be addressed.

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 9
Comment from Larry Pesek
Public Submission    Posted: 03/04/2010     ID: NOAA-NMFS-2008-0310-0014

Mar 01,2010 11:59 PM ET
Comment from jim elliott
Public Submission    Posted: 03/04/2010     ID: NOAA-NMFS-2008-0310-0015

Mar 01,2010 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Charles Saussy
Public Submission    Posted: 03/04/2010     ID: NOAA-NMFS-2008-0310-0016

Mar 01,2010 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Dan MacMahon
Public Submission    Posted: 03/04/2010     ID: NOAA-NMFS-2008-0310-0017

Mar 01,2010 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Ellen Schousboe
Public Submission    Posted: 03/04/2010     ID: NOAA-NMFS-2008-0310-0018

Mar 01,2010 11:59 PM ET