Comment from jean public

rin 0648-xa311 - i do not support this experimental popul,atoin. climate change and too much overfishing by commercial fish profiteers has caused this loss. why should the bill be sent to general taxpayers to pay for what commercial fish profiteers caused? because commercial fish profiteers caused this loss, they should have to pay a tax to pay for this experiment, not the people who had nothing to do with it. the polluters also can be taxed if they polluted the river. you need to send the bill to the people who caused it and stop burdening general taxpayers with bills that they had nothing to do with. this is an example of stupidity on noaas part or is it cupidity. they have been getting away with this crap for years. not taxing who the problem people are. these commercial fish profiteer greedy overfishers caused this loss. they need to pay up. it is time for them to pay up. find a way to tax the hell out of them. they have caused a species loss that is environmentally devastating to the rest of us, who used to own those fish. but we had nothing to do with their loss. and we shoudlnt be getting tax dollars from us spent on this stupidity by noaa.