THE RETENTION LIMIT NEEDS TO BE ZERO FOR SWORDFISH. NONE SHOUDL BE
CAUGHT. ONE HAS TO WONDER WHY THIS AGENCY HAS NO IDEA WHAT
PROFITEERING IS GOING ON FROM THE ONE LONGLINER IN THIS AREA BUT YOU
CALSSIFY IT AS "SMALL BUSINESS". SINCE YOU HAVE NO IDEA OF THE
PROFITEERING AND PROFITS FROM THIS LONGLINER, IT COULD BE BIG BUSINESS.
MOST AMERICNAS CONSIDER $5 MILLION AS BIG BUSINESS. WHY DONT YOU KNOW
WHAT THIS COMMERCIAL PROFITEERS IS PULLNIG FROM THE SEA, SINCE ALL
AMERICANS OWN THOSE FISH. WE OWN THOSE FISH. WE ARE ENTITLED TO KNOW
WHAT THE LONGLINER IS PULLING IN IN PROFITS FROM WHAT WE OWN. ARE YOU
NEGLIGENT OR LAX OR SOMETHING? PLEASE EXPLAIN.
ALL LONGLINING IN THIS AREA SHOULD BE COMPLETELY SHUT DOWN.
JEAN PUBLIC ADDRESS IF REQUIRED
Public Comment
This is comment on Proposed Rule
Fisheries Off West Coast States: Highly Migratory Species Fisheries; Swordfish Retention Limits
View Comment
Related Comments
Public Submission Posted: 11/22/2011 ID: NOAA-NMFS-2011-0211-0003
Nov 21,2011 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 11/22/2011 ID: NOAA-NMFS-2011-0211-0005
Nov 21,2011 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 01/03/2012 ID: NOAA-NMFS-2011-0211-0007
Nov 21,2011 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 11/22/2011 ID: NOAA-NMFS-2011-0211-0006
Nov 21,2011 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 11/22/2011 ID: NOAA-NMFS-2011-0211-0004
Nov 21,2011 11:59 PM ET