BirdLife strongly urges an extensino of the public comment period from 30 days (June 22) to 90 days (August 21).
Under the FAO Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries and the UN Fish Stocks Agreement, there is clear responsibility for fishing nations to share data. BirdLife’s interest is in the impact of global fishing fleets on non-target species such as threatened albatrosses, turtles and sharks. In order to understand and mitigate the impacts of global fishing fleets, it is vital that it is possible to pool data from global observer programs and make these data available to non-target taxa experts to analyze.
Public access to such information is vital to ensure that fisheries management decisions are made in a manner consistent with public trust management global marine resources.
A 30-day public comment period is an insufficient amount of time for affected members of the public and scientific community to voice their concerns. The desire for expeditious regulatory revisions should not outweigh the need for transparency in this process. All stakeholders must be allowed adequate time to comment on this critically important issue.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Dr Cleo Small
Senior Policy Officer
BirdLife International Global Seabird Programme
RSPB, The Lodge, Sandy, Bedfordshire, SG19 2DL, UK
Tel: +44 (0)1767 693586
Comment from Cleo Small
This is comment on Proposed Rule
Confidentiality of Information; Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Reauthorization Act
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 06/06/2012 ID: NOAA-NMFS-2012-0030-0002
Jun 22,2012 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 06/06/2012 ID: NOAA-NMFS-2012-0030-0003
Jun 22,2012 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 06/06/2012 ID: NOAA-NMFS-2012-0030-0004
Jun 22,2012 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 06/06/2012 ID: NOAA-NMFS-2012-0030-0005
Jun 22,2012 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 06/07/2012 ID: NOAA-NMFS-2012-0030-0006
Jun 22,2012 11:59 PM ET