ALL CREATED SANCTUAR4IES SHUOLD BE SACROSANCT AND NOT MANAGED TO ALLOW ANY COMMERCIAL OR RECREATIONAL FISH PROFITEERS TO ENTER TO USE ANY PART OF THE SANCTUARY.I THINK THIS ALLEGED "CONSOLIDATION" DOES NOT NEED TO BE DONE. I DO NOT FEEL THIS PROPOSAL IS TRANSPARENT BUT INSTEAD HIDES PROBLEMS FROM THE PUBILC WHICH CAN QUICKLY BECOME CORRUPT AND INVALIDATE TRYING TO PROTECT THESE AREAS. AN EEZ SHUOLE NOT IMPIINGE ON A SANCTUARY PROTECTIVE AREA.SEC 922.5 SHOULD BAR ALL FISHING, BOATING DIVING, RESARCH AND EDUCATINO IN THE SANCTUARY AREA. I OPPOSE THIS PROPOSAL. I DO NOT THINK THE CHANGES EVER HELP THE SITUATION. ALL CHANGES BY THE BAD MGT AT THIS AGENCY SEEM TO MAKE PROTECTION WORSE AND WORSE AND WORSE. THE GUYS ON THE INSIDE AT NOAA ARE THE SAME ONES WHO OVERSAW EXTINCTION OF COD IN THE GULF OF MAINE.
Comment from JEAN PUBLIC
This is comment on Proposed Rule
Amendments to National Marine Sanctuary Regulations
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 02/05/2013 ID: NOAA-NOS-2011-0120-0003
Mar 29,2013 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 02/01/2013 ID: NOAA-NOS-2011-0120-0002
Mar 29,2013 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 02/05/2013 ID: NOAA-NOS-2011-0120-0004
Mar 29,2013 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 03/20/2013 ID: NOAA-NOS-2011-0120-0005
Mar 29,2013 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 04/01/2013 ID: NOAA-NOS-2011-0120-0013
Mar 29,2013 11:59 PM ET