Comment from Bill McKay

Document ID: NOAA-NOS-2012-0077-0010
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: National Oceanic And Atmospheric Administration
Received Date: April 18 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: April 27 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: April 12 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: May 25 2012, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80fff304
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

Taken over the phone by Stephanie Gandulla My view is what you’ve done has tremendous value. I mean it’s a gift to our children. It really is. It’s tremendous the way you do it. Set up in a very nice park area, which is probably one of the nicest things about Alpena. However my concern with this proposed expansion is that we’re going to dilute the financial aid that’s available to support this institution and further this particular thing. Were it more publicized it would be advantageous to Alpena financially. You’ve got a showplace there, absolutely. Changing exhibits are tremendous. My family and I have enjoyed many times…. anyone who doesn’t is missing something! I don’t think it should be diluted to having facilities in other towns. These are tough economic times -- these other counties are going to see Alpena getting this and they want some. I think what we need to do is concentrate it on making this facility the top going toe nation which I think it already is. One thing you could do is probably encourage the schools to work with you because many of these children don’t have any idea that these counties have maritime heritage. Alpena has very few candles and this is definitely one! If we spread it too thin, it will turn out like a cake with no frosting! We’ve got the cake and we’ve got the frosting, let’s keep it here. You can’t get a half bushel out of a bushel. We just literally can’t afford to do that. If we try to then this will get diluted and nobody will have anything. Thank you very much!

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 53
Comment from Kevin Karpinsky
Public Submission    Posted: 04/27/2012     ID: NOAA-NOS-2012-0077-0007

May 25,2012 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Nancy Smithem
Public Submission    Posted: 04/27/2012     ID: NOAA-NOS-2012-0077-0008

May 25,2012 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Bill McKay
Public Submission    Posted: 04/27/2012     ID: NOAA-NOS-2012-0077-0010

May 25,2012 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Charles Wiesen
Public Submission    Posted: 04/30/2012     ID: NOAA-NOS-2012-0077-0011

May 25,2012 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Meeks
Public Submission    Posted: 04/30/2012     ID: NOAA-NOS-2012-0077-0012

May 25,2012 11:59 PM ET