In my considerable experience (I serve on the Channel Islands Marine Sanctuary Advisory Council), NOAA Sanctuaries always supports efforts and proposals to create or expand no-fishing zones such as Marine Protected Areas. By these actions, NOAA Sanctuaries turns its back on its number 1 onsite constituency... fishers (both recreational and commercial).
Ther may be no current agenda items related to no-fishing zones at the time that boundary expansion is being considered, but it is certain that such agenda items will come up in the future and NOAA Sanctuaries has an unwavering history of ignoring fishers during battles over closing areas to fishing. Because of this I recommend AGAINST EXPANSION.
Comment from Capt. David Bacon
This is comment on Proposed Rule
Environmental Impact Statements; Availability, etc.: Boundary Expansion of Cordell Bank and Gulf of the Farallones National Marine Sanctuaries
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 01/08/2013 ID: NOAA-NOS-2012-0228-0005
Mar 01,2013 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 01/08/2013 ID: NOAA-NOS-2012-0228-0002
Mar 01,2013 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 01/09/2013 ID: NOAA-NOS-2012-0228-0009
Mar 01,2013 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 01/08/2013 ID: NOAA-NOS-2012-0228-0008
Mar 01,2013 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 01/08/2013 ID: NOAA-NOS-2012-0228-0007
Mar 01,2013 11:59 PM ET