Sanctuaries need permanence is order to be effective. Here in Virginia, we are employing a Biogenic approach to 3D substrate that cannot be removed or altered. Additionally, we require a minimum of three years monitoring and reporting the status of the project.
In a nutshell----- The proposed area must be armored with a enhanced naturally occurring accretion such as calcium carbonate to ensure long term goals can be reached.
Require a monitoring protocol for a minimum of three years. Sanctuaries require dedication in the first years of growth therefore a group monitoring the area will be on top of biological development.
Upland resources must also be a consideration.Localized water quality must be maintained. It would be pointless to
create a sanctuary where later the water standards become less than when the site was chosen.
Finally, a sound educational program must be in place per site. No sanctuary will be same as the next so a publication must be available informing all parties the purpose and benefits of sanctuaries.
Comment from Darryl Nixon
This is comment on Proposed Rule
Re-establishing the Sanctuary Nomination Process
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 07/08/2013 ID: NOAA-NOS-2013-0091-0012
Aug 27,2013 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 07/01/2013 ID: NOAA-NOS-2013-0091-0006
Aug 27,2013 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 07/01/2013 ID: NOAA-NOS-2013-0091-0004
Aug 27,2013 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 07/03/2013 ID: NOAA-NOS-2013-0091-0009
Aug 27,2013 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 07/03/2013 ID: NOAA-NOS-2013-0091-0011
Aug 27,2013 11:59 PM ET