- EComment

Document ID: NPS-2008-0005-0125
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: National Park Service
Received Date: July 27 2009, at 03:02 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: August 14 2009, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: July 24 2009, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: September 8 2009, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 809fb374
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

Alternative 2 is best considering the other alternative, but the limits are way too restrictive. You should not set any limit until you can prove some type of impairment. The Park Service is so incompetent they will never get it rght. This is yet another example of Park Service bureaucrats setting policy that violates the public's rights to access. They just pull numbers out of the air and then try to validate their decision. You can't eliminate the enjoyment of the current generation as an excuse to protect for future generations or you will eliminate all use current and future.

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 946
Comment on FR Doc # fr_doc_num
Public Submission    Posted: 08/17/2009     ID: NPS-2008-0005-0122

Sep 08,2009 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # fr_doc_num
Public Submission    Posted: 08/14/2009     ID: NPS-2008-0005-0123

Sep 08,2009 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # E9-17778
Public Submission    Posted: 08/14/2009     ID: NPS-2008-0005-0124

Sep 08,2009 11:59 PM ET
- EComment
Public Submission    Posted: 08/14/2009     ID: NPS-2008-0005-0125

Sep 08,2009 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # fr_doc_num
Public Submission    Posted: 08/14/2009     ID: NPS-2008-0005-0126

Sep 08,2009 11:59 PM ET