Comment on FR Doc # 2011-16786

Document ID: NPS-2011-0006-0003
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: National Park Service
Received Date: July 06 2011, at 12:01 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: July 8 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: July 5 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: September 6 2011, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80eba24e
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

I believe the allocation of 330 and 80 (Level A) is too high for the resources at stake. However, if this is the best we (i.e. this nation) can do for this unique one-of-a-kind world class National Park, then I support the rule. It is sad though that economic interests have such a stranglehold on how/when/where precious natural resources are protected and preserved.

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 147
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-16786
Public Submission    Posted: 07/08/2011     ID: NPS-2011-0006-0003

Sep 06,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-16786
Public Submission    Posted: 07/08/2011     ID: NPS-2011-0006-0004

Sep 06,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-16786
Public Submission    Posted: 07/08/2011     ID: NPS-2011-0006-0007

Sep 06,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-16786
Public Submission    Posted: 07/08/2011     ID: NPS-2011-0006-0009

Sep 06,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-16786
Public Submission    Posted: 07/08/2011     ID: NPS-2011-0006-0010

Sep 06,2011 11:59 PM ET