Comment (2) from Vincent Yalon, Stanford Medical School Blood Center

Document ID: NRC-2008-0419-0003
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Received Date: August 01 2008, at 02:41 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: August 8 2008, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: July 31 2008, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: September 30 2008, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 806a7a52
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

Please consider the impact of eliminating these devices without regard to the efficacy and reliability of replacement equipment. For example, x-ray devices have so far proven to be vastly more expensive (including maintenance costs) and less reliable than their irradiation source counterparts. Many organizations have resorted to purchasing two x-ray devices to account for the significant downtime associated with their unreliability. Blood Centers have spent tens-of thousands of dollars to secure their blood irradiators in compliance with Homeland Security regulations. Can we think about eliminating any "future" devices rather than take away the ones we currently use?

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 25
Comment (1) from Victor Anderson
Public Submission    Posted: 08/08/2008     ID: NRC-2008-0419-0002

Sep 30,2008 11:59 PM ET
Comment (2) from Vincent Yalon, Stanford Medical School Blood Center
Public Submission    Posted: 08/08/2008     ID: NRC-2008-0419-0003

Sep 30,2008 11:59 PM ET
Comment (3) from Curt Pendergrass, KY Radiation Health, Department for Public Health
Public Submission    Posted: 08/08/2008     ID: NRC-2008-0419-0004

Sep 30,2008 11:59 PM ET
Comment (4) from Ken Love, Christiana Core Health Services, Newark, DE
Public Submission    Posted: 08/08/2008     ID: NRC-2008-0419-0005

Sep 30,2008 11:59 PM ET
Comment (5) from Clare Grehofsky, Fluke Biomedical, Solon, OH
Public Submission    Posted: 08/08/2008     ID: NRC-2008-0419-0006

Sep 30,2008 11:59 PM ET