Please consider the impact of eliminating these devices without regard to the
efficacy and reliability of replacement equipment. For example, x-ray devices
have so far proven to be vastly more expensive (including maintenance costs) and
less reliable than their irradiation source counterparts. Many organizations
have resorted to purchasing two x-ray devices to account for the significant
downtime associated with their unreliability.
Blood Centers have spent tens-of thousands of dollars to secure their blood
irradiators in compliance with Homeland Security regulations.
Can we think about eliminating any "future" devices rather than take away the
ones we currently use?
Comment (2) from Vincent Yalon, Stanford Medical School Blood Center
This is comment on Notice
Request for Comments on the Security and Continued Use of Cesium- 137 Chloride Sources and Notice of Public Meeting
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 08/08/2008 ID: NRC-2008-0419-0002
Sep 30,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 08/08/2008 ID: NRC-2008-0419-0003
Sep 30,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 08/08/2008 ID: NRC-2008-0419-0004
Sep 30,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 08/08/2008 ID: NRC-2008-0419-0005
Sep 30,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 08/08/2008 ID: NRC-2008-0419-0006
Sep 30,2008 11:59 PM ET