Comment (1) of Laurent Gay on FR Doc # E9-30823

Document ID: NRC-2009-0568-0004
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Received Date: February 18 2010, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Date Posted: March 4 2010, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: March 4 2010, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: March 10 2010, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80aa7792
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

EDF is the developper of MAGIC. 1st point I reviewed quickly the draft of this FMG, and I am surprised to see that some MAGIC results are missing, for example in scenarios MCC, Fire Cable spreading room, corridor or annulus. Most of the time for cable temperature or heat fluxes. In summary, more or less, when there is a CFAST result available, one may find a MAGIC one. We sent the review of Dave Birkesalculation on april 2009. Why MAGIC results are missing ? 2nd point I would be gratefull if you put EDF in the acknowledgments paragraph (Laurent Gay and Eric Wizenne) for the reviewing of SAIC calculations. Regards

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 8
Comment (1) of Laurent Gay on FR Doc # E9-30823
Public Submission    Posted: 03/04/2010     ID: NRC-2009-0568-0004

Mar 10,2010 11:59 PM ET
Comment (3) of Nancy McNabb on Behalf of National Fire Protection Association on Draft NUREG-1934
Public Submission    Posted: 03/22/2010     ID: NRC-2009-0568-0006

Mar 10,2010 11:59 PM ET
Comment (4) of Jason E. Floyd on Draft NUREG-1934
Public Submission    Posted: 03/22/2010     ID: NRC-2009-0568-0007

Mar 10,2010 11:59 PM ET
Comment (8) of Mark Schairer on Draft NUREG-1934
Public Submission    Posted: 05/13/2010     ID: NRC-2009-0568-0011

Mar 10,2010 11:59 PM ET
Comment (9) of Dae Kang on Behalf of Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute on Draft NUREG-1934
Public Submission    Posted: 03/24/2011     ID: NRC-2009-0568-0012

Mar 10,2010 11:59 PM ET