EDF is the developper of MAGIC.
1st point
I reviewed quickly the draft of this FMG, and I am surprised to see that some MAGIC results are missing, for example
in scenarios MCC, Fire Cable spreading room, corridor or annulus. Most of the time for cable temperature or heat fluxes.
In summary, more or less, when there is a CFAST result available, one may find a MAGIC one.
We sent the review of Dave Birkesalculation on april 2009.
Why MAGIC results are missing ?
2nd point
I would be gratefull if you put EDF in the acknowledgments paragraph (Laurent Gay and Eric Wizenne) for the reviewing of SAIC calculations.
Regards
Comment (1) of Laurent Gay on FR Doc # E9-30823
This is comment on Notice
NUREG-1934, Nuclear Power Plant Fire Modeling Application Guide (NPP FIRE MAG), Draft Report for Comment
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 03/04/2010 ID: NRC-2009-0568-0004
Mar 10,2010 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 03/22/2010 ID: NRC-2009-0568-0006
Mar 10,2010 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 03/22/2010 ID: NRC-2009-0568-0007
Mar 10,2010 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 05/13/2010 ID: NRC-2009-0568-0011
Mar 10,2010 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 03/24/2011 ID: NRC-2009-0568-0012
Mar 10,2010 11:59 PM ET