Comment (24) of Craig Banner on FR Doc # 2010-11842

Document ID: NRC-2010-0080-0035
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Received Date: July 07 2010, at 12:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: July 29 2010, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: May 18 2010, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: August 9 2010, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80b144d2
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

Attached file is a suggested re-write of Section 4, Radiological Assessment Based PAR starting on page 12 of Supplement 3. The intent is to provide more specific guidance on what conditions should be considered before using a dose assessment based PAR in place of a Fission Product Barrier based PAR. In any case, a paragraph is suggested that discusses the expectation that the PAR development process should also be discussed and understood by EPZ Offiste Response Organizatons and specific site characteristics should be considered in PAR procedure development.

Attachments:

Comment (24) of Craig Banner on FR Doc # 2010-11842

Title:
Comment (24) of Craig Banner on FR Doc # 2010-11842

View Attachment: View as format msw8

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 28
Comment (20) of Stephen Payne on FR Doc # 2010-11842
Public Submission    Posted: 06/16/2010     ID: NRC-2010-0080-0029

Aug 09,2010 11:59 PM ET
Comment (21) of Susan Perkins-Grew on FR Doc # 2010-11842
Public Submission    Posted: 06/21/2010     ID: NRC-2010-0080-0030

Aug 09,2010 11:59 PM ET
Comment (18) of Michael Bear on FR Doc # 2010-11842
Public Submission    Posted: 07/01/2010     ID: NRC-2010-0080-0032

Aug 09,2010 11:59 PM ET
Comment (26) of Brian Sullivan on Behalf of Entergy Nuclear Northeast on NUREG-0654
Public Submission    Posted: 08/17/2010     ID: NRC-2010-0080-0037

Aug 09,2010 11:59 PM ET
Comment (27) of Cheryl Chubb on FR Doc # 2010-11842
Public Submission    Posted: 08/17/2010     ID: NRC-2010-0080-0038

Aug 09,2010 11:59 PM ET