Comment (3) of Stephen Boyd on FR Doc # 2012-28436

Document ID: NRC-2011-0246-0007
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Received Date: December 03 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Date Posted: December 17 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: November 23 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: February 6 2013, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 1jw-82bx-i5si
View Document:  View as format xml

This is comment on Proposed Rule

Retrospective Review Under Executive Order 13579

View Comment

The scientifically incorrect classification of thorium as equal to the fissile isotope of uranium (uranium-235 or 235U), under the 1954 Atomic Energy Act is currently having a deleterious impact on American innovation. Private and public ventures in China, India, the Czech Republic, Australia and several other countries are currently exploring the potential merit of using the 100% naturally abundant thorium-232 (232Th) isotope to produce nuclear energy. While not at all a panacea, 232Th (particularly when deployed in a molten-salt reactor) offers several fiscal and practical advantages over the less abundant, fissile 235U: unremarkable chemistry; no enrichment; negligible resultant production of plutonium-239, as well as several other interesting consequences. It would be in the best interest of both the public and private good to review the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR X, where X = 30, 40; 60-110). Given that the U.S. led the research and development into thorium decay streams in particular and molten-salt reactors in general from 1951-1976, it seems appropriate that we at least correct the physics error which has resided in Federal Legislation for almost 60 years. Even more provocative would be to permit public and private efforts to join the research that is currently occurring elsewhere in the world, as a direct result of American minds nearly six decades ago.

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 8
Comment (1) of Charles Joline on FR Doc # 2012-28436
Public Submission    Posted: 12/06/2012     ID: NRC-2011-0246-0005

Feb 06,2013 11:59 PM ET
Comment (3) of Stephen Boyd on FR Doc # 2012-28436
Public Submission    Posted: 12/17/2012     ID: NRC-2011-0246-0007

Feb 06,2013 11:59 PM ET
Comment (2) of Alexander Cannera on Retrospective Review of Rulemaking
Public Submission    Posted: 12/17/2012     ID: NRC-2011-0246-0006

Feb 06,2013 11:59 PM ET
Comment (8) of Mark Sokolow on FR Doc # 2012-28436
Public Submission    Posted: 02/28/2013     ID: NRC-2011-0246-0012

Feb 06,2013 11:59 PM ET
Comment (6) of Adrian P. Heymer on Retrospective Review of Rulemaking
Public Submission    Posted: 02/28/2013     ID: NRC-2011-0246-0010

Feb 06,2013 11:59 PM ET