Comment (17) of Kaiya Ansorge on FR Doc # 2012-28425

Document ID: NRC-2012-0277-0020
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Received Date: January 02 2013, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Date Posted: January 18 2013, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: November 26 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: January 10 2013, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 1jx-82vl-fguv
View Document:

This is comment on Notice

Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for Proposed Dewey-Burdock In-Situ Uranium Recovery Project in Custer and Fall River Counties, SD

View Comment

Please allow more input and research for the Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) on Powertech's Dewey-Burdock project. The company has only supplied partial info and no outside party has been used to check on their info. Due to forest fires, this may be a risky project that could cost the US government lots of money to clean up after a fire or other unforeseen event. Also, the company itself does not have the financial ability to complete the project in a safe way, so the US government would be responsible for its shortcuts that result in accidents or accidental exposures.

Related Comments

View All

Total: 174

Comment (10) of Katie Aleman on Supplemental EIS for Dewey-Burkock In-Situ Uranium Recovery Project
Public Submission Posted: 01/18/2013 ID: NRC-2012-0277-0013