Comment (7) of Tara Pilkinton on FR Doc # 2013-05491

Document ID: NRC-2013-0037-0010
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Received Date: April 19 2013, at 12:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: May 6 2013, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: March 8 2013, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: May 3 2013, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 1jx-84v7-twii
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

Based on the age of the SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT plant and critical safety factors including flooding, earthquake and plant design Sequoyah’s license should not be extended. TVA’s Sequoyah is at risk from flooding which could result from the failure of upstream dams. The Eastern Tennessee Seismic Zone, which extends from southwest Virginia to northeast Alabama, is considered to be one of the most active seismic areas east of the Rocky Mountains. It has the potential to produce large magnitude earthquakes. Recent large earthquakes include a magnitude 4.6 that occurred in 1973 near Knoxville and the Fort Payne Earthquake, also a magnitude 4.6, that occurred in 2003 near Scottsboro, Alabama. The containment buildings of nuclear reactors must do two things without fail: contain radioactive emissions during an accident and prevent intrusion from outside forces such as wind driven objects and man-made missiles. Sequoyah’s nuclear reactors utilize “ice condenser” containment structures. Ice condenser nuclear reactors utilize baskets office to reduce heat and pressure in the event of an accident, preventing damage to the containment and leaks of radioactive steam. Typical nuclear power plants have concrete containment several feet thick, but ice condenser reactors substitute a steel shell of smaller volume and less ability to withstand pressure. Ice condenser reactors economize on concrete and are less robust because of this construction method.

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 17
Comment (2) of David Lochbaum on FR Doc # 2013-05491
Public Submission    Posted: 04/26/2013     ID: NRC-2013-0037-0005

May 03,2013 11:59 PM ET
Comment (4) of Jeannie Hacker-Cerulean on FR Doc # 2013-05491
Public Submission    Posted: 05/06/2013     ID: NRC-2013-0037-0007

May 03,2013 11:59 PM ET
Comment (5) of Sylvia D. Aldrich on FR Doc # 2013-05491
Public Submission    Posted: 05/06/2013     ID: NRC-2013-0037-0008

May 03,2013 11:59 PM ET
Comment (11) of Sandra Kurtz on License Renewal Application for Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2
Public Submission    Posted: 05/23/2013     ID: NRC-2013-0037-0015

May 03,2013 11:59 PM ET
Comment (7) of Tara Pilkinton on FR Doc # 2013-05491
Public Submission    Posted: 05/06/2013     ID: NRC-2013-0037-0010

May 03,2013 11:59 PM ET