Comment (1) of Yonggang Fang on FR Doc # 2013-04514

Document ID: NRC-2013-0041-0003
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Received Date: March 14 2013, at 12:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: March 26 2013, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: March 1 2013, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: April 1 2013, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 1jx-8478-33ze
View Document:

This is comment on Notice

Standard Review Plan; Proposed Revision to Design of Structures, Components, Equipment and Systems

View Comment

We found equation (1) in SRP 3.7.1 App A and B should be circular frequency ?, namely 2pf. If using the frequency f to substitute for 2pf directly, then the 2p should be cancelled in denominator, otherwise the difference 2p exist in the equation . In addition, the formula in NUREG/CR-5347 cited by SRP 3.7.1 also use the circular frequency ?, and it isn't so simple for SRP to change it for f. Is our description right, you know, someone found the problem when deducting the equation .However, i think it should be checked.

Related Comments

View All

Total: 7

Comment (1) of Yonggang Fang on FR Doc # 2013-04514
Public Submission Posted: 03/26/2013 ID: NRC-2013-0041-0003