Comment (1) of George Morris on FR Doc # 2013-05612

Document ID: NRC-2013-0048-0003
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Received Date: April 14 2013, at 12:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: May 6 2013, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: March 12 2013, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: May 13 2013, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 1jx-84rg-11as
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

Please consider the following enhancements to DG 1269 1 Replace the battery "BEFORE" capacity reaches 80% not "when capacity drops below 80%. 2 Fully charged float current range is stated as '0.5 - 2.0 Amps" However most utilities are using 2.0 A as their acceptance limit for all the installed batteries independent of size, even though the actual recorded float current in many cases is less than 50 milliamps. The universal use of a 2 Amp acceptance criteria appears un-conservative. Because of this variation in actual field measurements of float current, the sizing calculation recommendations in IEEE-485 should use a Design Margin correction factor of no less than 1.05 to account for the "not fully recharged" condition. 3 Using float current as a measure of charge should be only used for a limited time following a recharge when the electrolyte may be stratified. Float current can be affected by a number of variables besides the average condition of a string of cells, such as the actual float voltage and the inter-cell connection resistance. 4 If float current is used to determine capacity, a calibrated shunt, as noted in the referenced NUREC/CR-7148, should be used NOT a clamp-on meter. 5 The Acceptance Criteria for the Service Test and the Modified Performance Test should have BOTH the Load Current Profile and the Required Minimum Voltage Profile for all period steps during service duty portion of both tests. 6 The service duty portion of the modified performance test is an as-found test with no temperature compensation. Therefore, the total Amp-hours removed in the service duty portion of the modified performance test should be adjusted for initial electrolyte temperature when calculating the total amp-hours to be discharged in the performance duty section.

Related Comments

   
Total: 2
Comment (1) of George Morris on FR Doc # 2013-05612
Public Submission    Posted: 05/06/2013     ID: NRC-2013-0048-0003

May 13,2013 11:59 PM ET
Comment (2) of Mark A. Richter on DG-1269
Public Submission    Posted: 05/23/2013     ID: NRC-2013-0048-0004

May 13,2013 11:59 PM ET