Comment (63) of Mary-Alice Shemo on FR Doc # 2013-10792

Document ID: NRC-2013-0063-0065
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Received Date: May 29 2013, at 12:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: June 27 2013, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: May 7 2013, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: June 3 2013, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 1jx-85m1-swf6
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

Granting this exception was completely inappropriate. Grow some spine! Given Indian Point's location, a runaway failure there would be much worse than any nuclear accident so far. Make them replace or reinforce the insulation. Your job is to protect the public, not a company's profits.

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 115
Comment (98) of Merideth Genin on FR Doc # 2013-10792
Public Submission    Posted: 06/28/2013     ID: NRC-2013-0063-0100

Jun 03,2013 11:59 PM ET
Comment (63) of Mary-Alice Shemo on FR Doc # 2013-10792
Public Submission    Posted: 06/27/2013     ID: NRC-2013-0063-0065

Jun 03,2013 11:59 PM ET
Comment (52) of Jill Simon on FR Doc # 2013-10792
Public Submission    Posted: 06/27/2013     ID: NRC-2013-0063-0054

Jun 03,2013 11:59 PM ET
Comment (4) of Tania Venion on Indian Point Draft Environmental Assessment
Public Submission    Posted: 06/25/2013     ID: NRC-2013-0063-0006

Jun 03,2013 11:59 PM ET
Comment (46) of James Schmitt on FR Doc # 2013-10792
Public Submission    Posted: 06/27/2013     ID: NRC-2013-0063-0048

Jun 03,2013 11:59 PM ET