Comment from William J Bentley

Document ID: OSHA-2007-0032-0056
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Occupational Safety And Health Administration
Received Date: July 01 2007, at 02:41 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: July 9 2007, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: April 13 2007, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: July 13 2007, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 8025b27c
View Document:  View as format xml

This is comment on Proposed Rule

Explosives; Extension of Comment Period

View Comment

The issue this proposed rule attempts to fix is largely imagined. If the rule was really meant to solve a genuine problem in existence today, the author would not need to go back to 1947 to find support for his argument for change. I believe this proposed rule is nothing more than an attempt to further erode the freedoms granted to the people of the U.S. by the 2nd Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. Therefore, I am firmly opposed to it being adopted as an OSHA rule. William J Bentley, The High Road

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 978
Comment from John E. Darney
Public Submission    Posted: 07/09/2007     ID: OSHA-2007-0032-0019

Jul 13,2007 11:59 PM ET
Comment from William J Bentley
Public Submission    Posted: 07/09/2007     ID: OSHA-2007-0032-0056

Jul 13,2007 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Travis Evans
Public Submission    Posted: 08/20/2007     ID: OSHA-2007-0032-5961

Jul 13,2007 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Scot E. Thompson
Public Submission    Posted: 08/20/2007     ID: OSHA-2007-0032-5962

Jul 13,2007 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Craig Columbus
Public Submission    Posted: 08/20/2007     ID: OSHA-2007-0032-5963

Jul 13,2007 11:59 PM ET