Comment from James Maas, West Alameda Baptist Church

Document ID: OSHA-2007-0032-3213
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Occupational Safety And Health Administration
Received Date: July 17 2007, at 11:16 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: July 19 2007, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: April 13 2007, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: July 17 2007, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80269afe
View Document:  View as format xml

This is comment on Proposed Rule

Explosives; Close of comment period

View Comment

OSHA Docket Office Docket No. OSHA-2007-0032 U.S. Department of Labor, Room N-2625 200 Constitution Ave., N.W. Washington, DC 20210 Re.: Docket No. OSHA-2007-0032 (Explosives?Proposed Rule) Dear Sir or Madam: I am writing in strong opposition to OSHA?s proposed rules on ?explosives,? which go far beyond regulating true explosives. These proposed rules would impose severe restrictions on the transportation and storage of small arms ammunition? both complete cartridges and handloading components such as black and smokeless powder, primers, and percussion caps. These restrictions go far beyond existing transportation and fire protection regulations. As a person who uses ammunition and components, I am very concerned that these regulations will have a serious effect on my ability to obtain these products. OSHA?s proposed rules would impose restrictions that very few gun stores, sporting goods stores, or ammunition dealers could comply with. (Prohibiting firearms in stores that sell ammunition, for example, is absurd?but would be required under the proposed rule.) The proposed transportation regulations would also affect shooters? ability to buy these components by mail or online, because shipping companies would also have great difficulty complying with the proposed rules. There is absolutely no evidence of any new safety hazard from storage or transportation of small arms ammunition or components that would justify these new rules. I also understand that organizations with expertise in this field, such as the National Rifle Association, National Shooting Sports Foundation, and Sporting Arms and Ammunition Manufacturers? Association, will be submitting detailed comments on this issue. I hope OSHA will listen to these organizations? comments as the agency develops a final rule on this issue. Sincerely, James Maas

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 50
Comment from James Maas, West Alameda Baptist Church
Public Submission    Posted: 07/19/2007     ID: OSHA-2007-0032-3213

Jul 17,2007 11:59 PM ET
Comment from David C. Crane
Public Submission    Posted: 07/19/2007     ID: OSHA-2007-0032-3215

Jul 17,2007 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Matthew J Pitchon
Public Submission    Posted: 07/19/2007     ID: OSHA-2007-0032-3216

Jul 17,2007 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Travis Hambach, MEMC
Public Submission    Posted: 07/19/2007     ID: OSHA-2007-0032-3217

Jul 17,2007 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Peter Zaranski
Public Submission    Posted: 07/19/2007     ID: OSHA-2007-0032-3218

Jul 17,2007 11:59 PM ET