Comment from Craig Columbus

Document ID: OSHA-2007-0032-5963
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Occupational Safety And Health Administration
Received Date: July 09 2007, at 10:48 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: August 20 2007, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: April 13 2007, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: July 13 2007, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 8026430b
View Document:  View as format xml

This is comment on Proposed Rule

Explosives; Extension of Comment Period

View Comment

OSHA Docket Office Docket No. OSHA-2007-0032 U.S. Department of Labor, Room N-2625 200 Constitution Ave., N.W. Washington, DC 20210 Re.: Docket No. OSHA-2007-0032 (Explosives?Proposed Rule) Dear Sir or Madam: I am writing in strong opposition to OSHA?s proposed rules on ?explosives,? which go far beyond regulating true explosives. These proposed rules would impose severe restrictions on the transportation and storage of small arms ammunition?both complete cartridges and handloading components such as black and smokeless powder, primers, and percussion caps. These restrictions go far beyond existing transportation and fire protection regulations. As a person who uses ammunition and components, I am very concerned that these regulations will have a serious effect on my ability to obtain these products. OSHA?s proposed rules would impose restrictions that very few gun stores, sporting goods stores, or ammunition dealers could comply with. (Prohibiting firearms in stores that sell ammunition, for example, is absurd?but would be required under the proposed rule.) The proposed transportation regulations would also affect shooters? ability to buy these components by mail or online, because shipping companies would also have great difficulty complying with the proposed rules. There is absolutely no evidence of any new safety hazard from storage or transportation of small arms ammunition or components that would justify these new rules. I also understand that organizations with expertise in this field, such as the National Rifle Association, National Shooting Sports Foundation, and Sporting Arms and Ammunition Manufacturers? Association, will be submitting detailed comments on this issue. I hope OSHA will listen to these organizations? comments as the agency develops a final rule on this issue. Sincerely, Craig Columbus

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 978
Comment from John E. Darney
Public Submission    Posted: 07/09/2007     ID: OSHA-2007-0032-0019

Jul 13,2007 11:59 PM ET
Comment from William J Bentley
Public Submission    Posted: 07/09/2007     ID: OSHA-2007-0032-0056

Jul 13,2007 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Travis Evans
Public Submission    Posted: 08/20/2007     ID: OSHA-2007-0032-5961

Jul 13,2007 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Scot E. Thompson
Public Submission    Posted: 08/20/2007     ID: OSHA-2007-0032-5962

Jul 13,2007 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Craig Columbus
Public Submission    Posted: 08/20/2007     ID: OSHA-2007-0032-5963

Jul 13,2007 11:59 PM ET