Like so many rules, it state what should happen but does not provide any means of readress if it doesn't. For example, what happens if the Assistant Secretary fails to meet the 60 day deadline. What happens if a party doesn't abide by the 15 day notice provision. OSHA has been severely criticized for having administrators who allow misjudgements about the validity of cases. The procedure again, has no means for a person to address such misjudgements or misperceptions. That is, the problem is OSHA operates under the false assumption that it's always right when history proves it's usually been wrong. The only way that will change is if you have a process that includes self-correction and correction by others when procedures fail, misunderstandings occur etc. ... OSHA should treat itself as if it is delivering a product as CPSIA with the same sort of self-correcting mechanisms that corporations are required to have as well as a regulatory administrators that make sure that OSHA is playing by its own rules. This idea of an honor system in this day and age is absurd.
Comment from Miller, Todd; 56377
This is comment on Rule
Procedures for the Handling of Retaliation Complaints under Section 219 of the 2008 Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008. Interim Final Rule; Request for Comments.
View Comment
Related Comments
Public Submission Posted: 10/12/2010 ID: OSHA-2010-0006-0002
Nov 01,2010 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 11/01/2010 ID: OSHA-2010-0006-0003
Nov 01,2010 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 11/02/2010 ID: OSHA-2010-0006-0004
Nov 01,2010 11:59 PM ET