I understand the need to have oversight of hospitalizations and amputations in order to effectively target.
However, why not work with the OWCP and State Workers Compensation programs to get that data? That paperwork already exists, this is redundant reporting.
By changing the reporting requirements would require re-training of all HR and Safety professional. Remember how difficult it was to define a “First Aid Only” injury? The same can be said for “in-patient hospitalizations” (4 hr stay for monitoring or overnight stay?) and “amputations” (e.g. would the tip of a finger count?). Also, you’ll need more employees at OSHA’s end to take calls, questions, and crunch all the incoming data into something useful for your accident investigators in the field. As a Federal employee myself (on the west coast) I know how exceedingly difficult it is to get someone in Washington DC on the phone.
With the pending Federal budget cut-backs I don’t think this is a sustainable plan.
Comment from Williams, Aaron; USDA
This is comment on Proposed Rule
Occupational Injury and Illness Recording and Reporting Requirements: NAICS Update and Reporting Revisions. Action: Proposed rule.
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 06/22/2011 ID: OSHA-2010-0019-0014
Sep 20,2011 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 06/22/2011 ID: OSHA-2010-0019-0015
Sep 20,2011 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 06/23/2011 ID: OSHA-2010-0019-0016
Sep 20,2011 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 06/28/2011 ID: OSHA-2010-0019-0017
Sep 20,2011 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 07/06/2011 ID: OSHA-2010-0019-0018
Sep 20,2011 11:59 PM ET