eLaws | eCases | United States Code | Federal Courts |
Home » Rulemaking » Tom Schwerdt - Comment

Tom Schwerdt - Comment

Document ID: PHMSA-2011-0023-0019
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Pipeline And Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
Received Date: December 08 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Date Posted: December 8 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: November 16 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: January 20 2012, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80f7daf3
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

Every pipeline which could put the public at significant risk (such as the San Bruno/PG&E gas line) should be required to have periodic hydrostatic or other rigorous performance testing. Once a decade sounds about right.

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 78
Harris County Fire Marshal's Office - Comment
Public Submission    Posted: 11/29/2011     ID: PHMSA-2011-0023-0010

Jan 20,2012 11:59 PM ET
National Teransportation Safety Board - Comment
Public Submission    Posted: 12/08/2011     ID: PHMSA-2011-0023-0018

Jan 20,2012 11:59 PM ET
Tom Schwerdt - Comment
Public Submission    Posted: 12/08/2011     ID: PHMSA-2011-0023-0019

Jan 20,2012 11:59 PM ET
State of Alaska - Comment
Public Submission    Posted: 12/09/2011     ID: PHMSA-2011-0023-0020

Jan 20,2012 11:59 PM ET
The Iowa Utilities Board - Comment
Public Submission    Posted: 12/28/2011     ID: PHMSA-2011-0023-0022

Jan 20,2012 11:59 PM ET