Re: Proposed Regulation Integrity Management Program for Gas Distribution
Pipelines
October 15, 2008
Lamoni Municipal Utilities has operated a Municipal owned natural gas system for
almost 50 years. Lamoni has 890 customers with a annual load of 120,000 dth .
As a small system operator we rely on groups like American Pubic Gas
Association ( APGA ) and Iowa Association of Municipal Utilities ( IAMU ). Since
we are a small system we can’t afford an engineer on staff. Our membership in
APGA and IAMU is like having an engineering firm on staff. These two
organizations keep us informed on changing regulations, safety concerns;
additionally IAMU performs our OQ training. When ever a new problem arises we
are alerted by APGA or IAMU.
Concerning integrity management, we don’t have the staff to analyze the reasons
why a pipe failed. I don’t intend to hire an engineer to tell me how many pounds of
pressure the tooth of the back hoe exerted when it cut the gas main. Nor will I
hire an engineer to tell me why a joint failed. Combining our OQ training with
good equipment and material, our joints don ‘t fail. These aren’t records that
would be of any value to us in operating and maintaining our system. There are
already requirements to keep all our inspection and maintenance records. We
think PHMSA should keep the current recordkeeping periods for our inspection
and maintenance records and not require us to document all the details of how we
develop our IM plan.
Investor owned facilities already report on thousands of miles of pipe line and
hundreds of thousands of services. The investor owned company’s employ
hundreds of engineers in mulitiple engineering departments. I gain by their
voluntary data submittal. When a problem exists in the gas world, the entire trade
knows through alert messages sent out via PHSMA, IPGA, and IAMU to name a
few.
Many of the new changes are things we already do and submit in another format.
In the electrical world, the EIA asks us for data, and the State of Iowa asks us for
the exact data, (but in their format). Some times I wonder why government
agency’s don’t talk to each other but require. Another concern seems to be
redundancy of this proposed rule with other program already in place. The rule
would have me develop leak identification and monitoring criteria, our O&M already
addresses what has to be monitored and immediately repaired
We have an operator qualification program, a drug and alcohol testing program
and a damage prevention program. We have not had any accidents caused by our
employees so we don’t see any benefit in including in our integrity management
plan a section on “Assuring Individual Performance.” That would just be more
paperwork. The existing rules are adequate to ensure our workers are qualified.
Respectfully Submitted,
Emil F. Segebart Jr.
General Manager
Lamoni Municipal Utilities
Lamoni, Iowa
Lamoni Municipal Utilities - Comments
This is comment on Rule
Pipeline Safety: Integrity Management Program for Gas Distribution Pipelines
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 10/01/2008 ID: PHMSA-RSPA-2004-19854-0094
Oct 23,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 10/09/2008 ID: PHMSA-RSPA-2004-19854-0095
Oct 23,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 10/10/2008 ID: PHMSA-RSPA-2004-19854-0097
Oct 23,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 10/15/2008 ID: PHMSA-RSPA-2004-19854-0107
Oct 23,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 10/15/2008 ID: PHMSA-RSPA-2004-19854-0108
Oct 23,2008 11:59 PM ET