Comment on FR Doc # E9-25193

Document ID: SBA-2009-0018-0003
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Small Business Administration
Received Date: October 28 2009, at 12:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: November 10 2009, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: October 21 2009, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: December 21 2009, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80a4cc18
View Document:  View as format xml

This is comment on Proposed Rule

Small Business Size Standards: Retail Trade

View Comment

We strongly suppport the changes in the NAICS size standard determinations. We urge SBA to accelerate this process and to place in high priority the 56 series. In particular, solid waste management (562998) has a size standard that is not representative for contractors that deal with nuclear waste as opposed to other kind of waste. We recommend that a new NAICS code be added to deal separately with nuclear waste management. The sizes of small businesses on this area, given the more complex requirements are considerably larger than the other types of waste management contractors. In addition, the remediation code 562910 that has 500 employees as code, needs to be revisited too, since it is not representative any longer, the actual code should be considerably larger for nuclear remediation projects.

Related Comments

   
Total: 5
Comment on FR Doc # E9-25193
Public Submission    Posted: 11/10/2009     ID: SBA-2009-0018-0002

Dec 21,2009 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # E9-25193
Public Submission    Posted: 11/10/2009     ID: SBA-2009-0018-0003

Dec 21,2009 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # E9-25193
Public Submission    Posted: 11/10/2009     ID: SBA-2009-0018-0004

Dec 21,2009 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # E9-25193
Public Submission    Posted: 01/04/2010     ID: SBA-2009-0018-0005

Dec 21,2009 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # E9-25193
Public Submission    Posted: 01/04/2010     ID: SBA-2009-0018-0006

Dec 21,2009 11:59 PM ET