Comment on FR Doc # E9-29228

Document ID: SBA-2009-0019-0019
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Small Business Administration
Received Date: December 21 2009, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Date Posted: March 12 2010, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: December 9 2009, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: January 28 2010, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80a6eb9d
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

The proposed regulation would clarify when a joint venture may be populated or unpopulated. It indicates that whether a joint venture is populated or not depends on its structure. That is, if it is a separate legal entity such as an LLC, it must have its own employees (populated) however "if a joint venture merely exissts through a written agreement, then it need not have its own employees" (unpopulated). Would the Government award a contract to a not established as a legal entity but set up only through a written agreement and could such an entity register itself in the CCR system? It is our belief that most of the current mentor protege joint ventures receiving awards are unpopulated LLCs. We recommentd tha SBA allow for unpopulated joint ventures set up as LLCs (separate legal entities).

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 97
Comment on FR Doc # E9-29228
Public Submission    Posted: 03/12/2010     ID: SBA-2009-0019-0017

Jan 28,2010 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # E9-29228
Public Submission    Posted: 03/12/2010     ID: SBA-2009-0019-0018

Jan 28,2010 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # E9-29228
Public Submission    Posted: 03/12/2010     ID: SBA-2009-0019-0019

Jan 28,2010 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # E9-29228
Public Submission    Posted: 03/12/2010     ID: SBA-2009-0019-0020

Jan 28,2010 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # E9-29228
Public Submission    Posted: 03/12/2010     ID: SBA-2009-0019-0021

Jan 28,2010 11:59 PM ET