Comment on FR Doc # 2011-25656

Document ID: SBA-2011-0010-0006
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Small Business Administration
Received Date: November 04 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: November 30 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: October 7 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: December 6 2011, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80f665f8
View Document:  View as format xml

This is comment on Proposed Rule

Small Business Size and Status Integrity

View Comment

Throughout the rule's specific changes, the assumption is made that each firm operates under a single NAICS code and associated size standard. That is often not the case. The final rule and specific subpart changes need to address the misrepresentation of size when a firm claims small business status under one NAICS code on a procurement for work being procured under a different (more restrictive) NAICS code. This also includes listings on procurement databases. Firms may perform work under multiple NAICS codes with significantly different size standards. They should not be allowed to carry their size from a more lenient standard to work identified as being covered by a more strict standard (e.g. Environmental Services – 500 FTEs versus Environmental Engineering - $4.5 million).

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 17
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-25656
Public Submission    Posted: 11/30/2011     ID: SBA-2011-0010-0003

Dec 06,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-25656
Public Submission    Posted: 11/30/2011     ID: SBA-2011-0010-0004

Dec 06,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-25656
Public Submission    Posted: 11/30/2011     ID: SBA-2011-0010-0005

Dec 06,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-25656
Public Submission    Posted: 11/30/2011     ID: SBA-2011-0010-0006

Dec 06,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-25656
Public Submission    Posted: 11/30/2011     ID: SBA-2011-0010-0009

Dec 06,2011 11:59 PM ET