The following concerns were presented:
• Although it is true that newer treatments for endocrine disorders have
resulted in better management of these conditions, not all claimants have access to
current/effective medical treatment. For example access to devices such as insulin
pumps depends on wealth or availability of medical insurance.
• New listing 109.08 – This states that SSA will consider a “child under
disability if he/she has any type of diabetes mellitus who requires daily insulin and
has not attained age 6”. The age of 6 seems very arbitrary. The developmental
abilities of children vary greatly and we cannot presume that simply because a child
has attained age 6 that the child will not have the same medical need for adult help
as younger children.
• Components mostly agree with the elimination of some of the subsections
of the endocrine listings. For example, the listing 9.08C (diabetes with retinitis
proliferans) may easily be evaluated under the Special Senses listings for visual
disorders. However other listings under the Endocrine system, such diabetes
insipidus (current listing 9.05) are more complex and perhaps the listing provision
should not be eliminated.
Public Comment from NY & NJ DDS
This is comment on Proposed Rule
Revised Medical Criteria for Evaluating Endocrine Disorders
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 01/29/2010 ID: SSA-2006-0114-0008
Feb 12,2010 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 02/01/2010 ID: SSA-2006-0114-0009
Feb 12,2010 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 02/12/2010 ID: SSA-2006-0114-0010
Feb 12,2010 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 02/12/2010 ID: SSA-2006-0114-0014
Feb 12,2010 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 02/12/2010 ID: SSA-2006-0114-0016
Feb 12,2010 11:59 PM ET