FL DDS Response to DDSAL No. 761
NPRM – Evaluating Malignant Neoplastic Diseases
Docket No. SSA-2007-0066
Adult Malignant Neoplastic Listings
?Changes/revisions to the introductory text-We appreciate the efforts to
incorporate into the BS 13 listings information relating to the advances in medical
knowledge, new medications and treatment, as well as, methods for evaluation of
malignant neoplastic diseases. We are pleased that the definition of “inoperable”
will be expanded further to discuss neoadjuvant therapy. This helps clarify the
intent of listing level severity, along with the discussion of “adjuvant therapy” in the
discussion of “unresectable” and the definition of “metastases” as opposed to
direct extension of a tumor to other tissue or organs. Revising the listing
introductory text to reflect current medical terminology will be very helpful for
adjudicators when reviewing the medical records for similar listing criteria, i.e., the
use of “indolent” lymphoma instead of “low grade or indolent,” and
clarifying “visceral metastases” to mean “metastasis to internal organs” (listing
13.24B). We would also suggest adding the term “multimodal” or
phrase “multimodal therapy” to the list of terms defined in 13.00I and 113.00I.
Additionally, reorganizing the terms in alphabetical order for easier reference will
also be of assistance.
?Adjudicators and medical consultants will improve their evaluation of recurrent
leukemia and lymphoma with the expanded acceptable methods of
documentation, i.e., testicular biopsy for recurrent leukemia, “clinically apparent”
by imaging studies or clinical examination to be of equivalent severity for
melanoma (13.02B2). Adding clarification that a brain tumor is considered
malignant if classified grade II or higher under WHO classification of the central
nervous system (CNS) will aid in evaluation of CNS. We are especially pleased to
see the addition of the WHO classification of the CNS, since this has been a very
complex body system with little formal guidance.
?We are also pleased to note the proposed revisions to the criteria in the adult
listing criteria will incorporate information from many of the Policy Net Questions
and Answers for further clarification of the intent of listing criteria:
13.02C- clarification of recurrent disease in the “false” vocal cords, rather than in
the “true” vocal cords;
13.03B2-adding additional criteria that melanoma with metastases to “clinically
apparent” lymph nodes or a finding of metastasis to four or more lymph nodes that
are not clinically apparent are both equivalent in severity to palpable nodal
metastases.
13.05A2-examples of aggressive and indolent lymphomas.
13.09C- new proposed listing for medullary carcinoma of the thyroid gland with
metastases beyond the regional lymph nodes. Although this cancer is relatively
rare, this new listing category provides additional guidance for listing level severity.
13.10B-addition of criteria for metastasis to the supraclavicular nodes and
metastasis to the infraclavicular nodes or to 10 or more axillary nodes to be of
listing-level severity. These additional listing criteria will be very helpful for case
evaluation/adjudication purposes.
13.11 and 13.13A1-editorial changes.
13.14C-expanding the criteria in current listing 13.14 for carcinoma of the lungs.
Childhood Malignant Neoplastic Diseases
The proposed revisions to 113.00 Childhood listings appear to correspond to
proposed changes to the 13.00 Adult listings. We appreciate the guidance to
evaluate medullary carcinoma of the thyroid for children under the criteria in the
13.09C adult listing.
General Comments
The FL DDS would like to submit the following recommendations and issues for
consideration:
1.RECOMMENDATION: We suggest that SSA add the AJCC Cancer Staging
Manual, 6th edition, to the STAT! Ref library in the SSA Digital Library in order to
make it available to all DDSs. This resource has been found to be extremely
helpful to FLDDS staff in evaluating criteria under the Malignant Neoplastic
Disease listings.
2.RECOMMENDATION: Our policy and Quality Assurance staff frequently
receives questions regarding duration issues, head and neck tumors, and
recurrent lymphoma. Please consider emphasizing these issues in the
introductory text, particularly regarding:
•Evidence needed to show the effectiveness of treatment and residuals to consider
after treatment (Tracking #05-129 and Tracking #05-053);
•clarification of multi-modal treatment (tracking #07-216),
•evaluation of tumors under listing 13.02A (Tracking #05-085); and
•recurrence three years or more after remission (Tracking #05-079).
•Additional discussion in the introductory text regarding common side effects
would be useful, e.g. lymphedema following a mastectomy.
3.Listing 13.03A Skin requires “to or beyond the regional lymph nodes.” Tumor
staging of either N1 or M1 criteria would be required to meet this listing level
severity requirement. (Stage III with any T, N1, M0 and Stage IV with any T, Any
N, M1). However, we find that extension of the skin cancer to the bone is not
considered “to or beyond the regional lymph node.” This scenario is generally
responsive/amenable to surgery. Please provide formal guidance on an example
involving T4, including RFC considerations. In the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual,
T4 staging indicates that the tumor invades deep extradermal structures (e.g.,
cartilage, skeletal muscle, or bone).
4.Listing 13.10A-Consider adding to the listings the criteria for metastatic breast
cancer to the axillary lymph node(s) involving perforation of the capsule of the
lymph node (with or without matting of the lymph nodes).
5.Please consider providing clarification in the introductory text or in the National
Q&As regarding the use of Gleason Grading. If the medical evidence of record
shows Gleason grade 5, can we use this to equate with listing level severity in
13.24?
6.Please provide general guidance on how to evaluate 13.02A for bilateral
neuroblastoma – is this considered extension beyond the midline?
If you have any questions or need further clarification of these comments, please
contact Patricia Sanders, Health Program Analyst, Florida DDS at
Patricia.Sanders@ssa.gov or 850/487-1491, ext 253.
Submitted on behalf of:
C. Louis Feté
Acting Director, FLDDS
Comment from Fete, Charles, FLDDS
This is comment on Proposed Rule
Revised Medical Criteria for Evaluating Malignant Neoplastic Diseases
View Comment
Related Comments
Public Submission Posted: 06/02/2008 ID: SSA-2007-0066-0002
Jun 27,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 06/12/2008 ID: SSA-2007-0066-0003
Jun 27,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 06/26/2008 ID: SSA-2007-0066-0005
Jun 27,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 06/26/2008 ID: SSA-2007-0066-0006
Jun 27,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 06/18/2008 ID: SSA-2007-0066-0004
Jun 27,2008 11:59 PM ET