Comment on FR Doc # N/A

It is very different when a set of good insurers are dealt an unpredictable blow by a common enemy, and the loss is supported by the public mint, than when, the very integrity of ownership of our common land having been threatened by haphazard calculations, the perpetrators expect support for their losses. By the first, we loose dwellings, but preserve our friends and so the dwellings can be restored. By the second we aim to preserve those who would destroy the very integrity of the ownership of our lands. The first will work out well, even if you proceed with the most haphazard calculation. The second will fail us all the more for the more you succeed...Unless the current frivolous financial companies are deemed more important than domestic ownership of our own lands and resources. Our money need not answer EVERY note drawn on it, but only every good note. Those who draw bad notes must fail with those who honor them. Then let mercy flow, and the mint free the oppressed as well as the oppressor.